Skip to main content

Print your lifetime tonnage

Free lifetime tonnage calculator. Plug in years lifting, sessions per week, sets, reps, and average load. Get a printable receipt comparing your total to elephants, planes, and the Statue of Liberty.

5 inputs · ~30s

The scale · one of these is you

yrs
per wk
sets
reps
lb
See how your plan gets built
$89/month.Cancel within 30 days for a full refund.

First plan in 4 minutes.

— Or —

Get your full strength report by email

We send one email today with the breakdown, plus a short nurture series. Unsubscribe anytime.

How this works

Lifetime tonnage is a multiplication, not a measurement. We chain five averages: years lifting, sessions per week, sets per session, reps per set, and average load. Each one is approximate, the multiplication is exact, and the result is correct to within an order of magnitude, which is the right resolution for the comparison line at the bottom.

The receipt format is intentional. It frames the work as something already paid for. You did the reps. We are just printing the receipt.

  1. Total sets

    Years × 52 weeks × sessions per week × working sets per session. A 4-year intermediate lifter doing 3 sessions a week of 18 working sets each lands at about 11,000 sets.

  2. Total reps

    Total sets × average reps per set. The same lifter with an average of 7 reps per working set crosses about 78,000 reps.

  3. Total load

    Total reps × average load. At 135 lb average, that is about 10.6 million pounds, the rough weight of a fully loaded Boeing 737 with fuel for a transcontinental flight.

  4. Compare against the ladder

    We pick the largest item on the comparison ladder you have exceeded 50 percent of. That gives you the biggest defensible flex without the rounding sliding into absurdity.

The comparisons are checked against published weights for each item. The math is grade-school. The screenshots write themselves.

Common questions

It is a Fermi estimate, not a log. The math multiplies five averages, so the answer is correct to within an order of magnitude, which is all the comparison line cares about. If you remembered every set of every workout for ten years and entered exact numbers, you would still get a five-percent-or-so error from rep-quality and load-variation noise.